论文部分内容阅读
目的观察中西药保守疗法治疗粘连性肠梗阻患者的效果。方法选取医院收治的粘连性肠梗阻患者60例,按照临床治疗方式的不同分为对照组和观察组各30例,对照组给予西药治疗,观察组在对照组基础上给予中药治疗(即中西医保守疗法),比较2组患者临床治疗效果包括首次肛门排气时间、白细胞计数恢复时间及相关症状消失时间等。结果观察组总有效率为93.3%,高于对照组的76.7%(P<0.05);观察组首次排气时间为(62.58±32.59)h,早于对照组的(83.20±30.56)h(P<0.05);白细胞计数恢复时间为(4.45±1.65)h,早于对照组的(5.38±1.68)h(P<0.05);观察组相关症状消失时间为(95.63±23.70)h,早于对照组的(125.35±31.20)h(P<0.05)。结论中西药保守疗法用于粘连性肠梗阻临床治疗效果较好,能够显著缩短患者临床治疗及预后恢复时间,改善治疗效果,值得临床推广应用。
Objective To observe the effect of traditional Chinese and western conservative treatment on patients with adhesive intestinal obstruction. Methods Sixty patients with adhesive intestinal obstruction treated in our hospital were divided into control group and observation group according to the different clinical treatment methods. The control group was treated with western medicine. The observation group was given traditional Chinese medicine treatment on the basis of the control group Conservative treatment). The clinical effects of the two groups were compared including the time of first anal exhaust, the recovery time of white blood cell count and the disappearance of related symptoms. Results The total effective rate in the observation group was 93.3%, which was higher than that in the control group (76.7%, P <0.05). The time of the first evacuation in the observation group was (62.58 ± 32.59) h, which was earlier than that in the control group (83.20 ± 30.56) h <0.05). The recovery time of white blood cell count was (4.45 ± 1.65) h, which was earlier than that of the control group (5.38 ± 1.68) h (P <0.05). The disappearance time of the symptoms in the observation group was (95.63 ± 23.70) h, Group (125.35 ± 31.20) h (P <0.05). Conclusion The conservative treatment of traditional Chinese and western medicine for adhesive intestinal obstruction clinical treatment is better, can significantly shorten the clinical treatment and prognosis recovery time, improve the therapeutic effect, it is worthy of clinical application.