论文部分内容阅读
取保候审作为刑事强制性措施的一种 ,是国家警察权和司法权的体现 ,其在适用时存在着较大的弹性 ,不易把握 ;且在实践中如何兼顾执法需要与公民权益也有相当的难度 ,因此往往成为人们议论的焦点。本文用比较之方法 ,将我国的取保候审制度与国外保释制度进行了对照分析 ,提出应扩大取保适用的对象、改进取保的执行方式、增加救济措施、完善监督机制等建议 ,并强调了公、检、法三机关间权力调整对改善我国取保候审制度的必要性。
As a kind of criminal compulsory measures, bail pending trial is the manifestation of the national police power and judicial power. When it is applied, there is greater flexibility and difficulty in grasping it. In practice, it is also quite difficult to balance the need of law enforcement and civil rights , So often become the focus of people’s discussion. This article compares the bail pending trial system in China with the foreign bail system in a comparative way, and proposes that we should expand the object of bail protection, improve the implementation of bailment, increase relief measures, improve the supervision mechanism and other recommendations, The Necessity of Improving the System of Bail in China after Examining and Arranging the Power Adjustment between the Three Authorities.