论文部分内容阅读
VOM模式是英美法系国家所普遍采用并且是最多采用的刑事和解模式。它建立在恢复性司法理念基础之上,以实现罪犯与被害人的“对话”为主要目标,在实践中取得了较好的效果。但随着VOM模式的发展,对其批评的声音与担忧也开始出现。VOM模式的发展表明英美刑事司法观从“极端的程序正义”向“关注实质正义”、从“罪犯(被告人)中心主义”向“罪犯(被告人)与被害人利益并重”、从“国家主义”向“社会与国家分权”的转变。鉴于VOM模式的良好发展前景与我国的现实基础,我国刑事和解中可以逐步发展这种VOM模式,但应当关注其已经暴露出的问题,引以为戒。
VOM model is commonly used by Anglo-American countries and is the most widely used criminal reconciliation model. It is based on the concept of restorative justice, with the main objective of realizing “dialogues ” between criminals and victims, and has achieved good results in practice. However, with the development of the VOM model, the voices and worries of criticism began to emerge. The development of the VOM model shows that Anglo-American criminal justice viewpoints from “extreme procedural justice” to “substantive justice” and from “criminal (defendant) centralism” to “criminal (defendant) and victim Both ”and“ change from ”nationalism “ to ”social and state decentralization ". In view of the good development prospect of VOM model and the realistic foundation of our country, this kind of VOM model can be developed step by step in our country’s criminal reconciliation, but we should pay attention to its already exposed problems and take it as precaution.