论文部分内容阅读
本文分别建立了集中式决策,无奖惩机制的分散式决策以及奖惩机制下考虑制造商竞争的闭环供应链决策模型。通过逆向归纳法对三种情况下决策变量的求解与比较,分别得到了闭环供应链的回购价、批发价、零售价及回收率。研究表明:与无奖惩机制下的分散式决策情形相比,政府奖惩机制能有效引导制造商降低新产品价格、提高回收率、增加闭环供应链各成员企业的利润,同时有利于增加消费者的利益;奖惩机制下主动回收废旧产品的制造商利润增加,不回收的制造商利润降低,有效引导了制造商的回收积极性,同时回收商与零售商利润的增加也提高了她们参与闭环供应链的积极性,进而使得整个闭环供应链的成员企业有效协调。
In this paper, decentralized decision making with no rewards and punishments is established, and the closed-loop supply chain decision-making model considering the manufacturer’s competition under rewards and punishments is established. Through the reverse induction method to solve and compare the decision variables in the three cases, the repo price, wholesale price, retail price and recovery rate of the closed-loop supply chain are respectively obtained. The research shows that compared with the decentralized decision-making without rewards and punishments, the government rewards and punishments mechanism can effectively guide manufacturers to lower the prices of new products, increase the recovery rate, increase the profits of all member companies in the closed-loop supply chain, and at the same time help to increase the consumers’ Profit; rewards and punishments under the initiative to recycle used products manufacturers increased profit margins, not to reduce the profits of manufacturers to effectively guide the manufacturer’s recycling initiative, while recyclers and retailers increased profits also increased their participation in closed-loop supply chain Enthusiasm, which in turn makes the entire closed-loop supply chain member companies to effectively coordinate.