论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨经尿道前列腺电切剜除术与传统经尿道前列腺汽化电切术治疗前列腺增生患者的临床疗效。方法选取前列腺手术治疗的76例前列腺增生患者作为研究对象,观察组38例患者行经尿道前列腺电切剜除术,对照组38例患者行传统经尿道前列腺汽化电切术,比较两组患者的治疗效果。结果观察组患者术中出血量、腺体切除量和术后最大尿流率和住院时间均少于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05);观察组患者术后并发症发生例数明显少于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论经尿道前列腺电切剜除术相对于传统经尿道前列腺汽化电切术治疗效果良好,术中操作方便,并发症较少。
Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of transurethral resection of prostate and traditional transurethral vaporization of the prostate in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Methods A total of 76 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia treated by prostatectomy were enrolled in this study. Thirty-eight patients in the observation group underwent transurethral resection of transurethral resection of the prostate. Thirty-eight patients in the control group underwent conventional transurethral vaporization of the prostate. effect. Results The intraoperative blood loss, the amount of gland resection and the maximum postoperative urinary flow rate and hospital stay in the observation group were less than those in the control group (all P <0.05). Postoperative complications occurred in the observation group The number of cases was significantly less than that of the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusions Transurethral resection of prostate resection is better than traditional transurethral resection of prostatectomy. The operation is convenient and the complication is less.