论文部分内容阅读
目的比较3种方法对颌面部间隙感染创面冲洗的除菌效果。方法将124例颌面部间隙感染患者随机分为两组,每组62例。对照组用过氧化氢溶液和生理盐水冲洗手术创面3~4次/d,实验组用酸性氧化电位水冲洗手术创面3~4次/d,观察比较两组患者创面冲洗前后细菌生长情况。结果用过氧化氢溶液与生理盐水和酸性氧化电位水冲洗创面除菌率分别为98.37%和98.55%,组间比较无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论酸性氧化电位水作为创面冲洗液,其除菌效果与过氧化氢溶液和生理盐水相当,值得临床推广使用。
Objective To compare the sterilizing effects of three methods on the maxillofacial space infection wound washing. Methods 124 patients with maxillofacial interspace infection were randomly divided into two groups (n = 62 in each group). The control group was treated with hydrogen peroxide solution and saline for 3 to 4 times a day, and the experimental group was treated with acid oxidation potential water for 3 to 4 times a day. The growth of bacteria in both groups before and after the wound was observed and compared. Results The sterilizing rates of wounds treated with hydrogen peroxide solution, saline solution and acidic oxidizing water were 98.37% and 98.55%, respectively. There was no significant difference between the two groups (P> 0.05). Conclusion Acid oxidizing potential water as a wound washing solution, its sterilization effect and hydrogen peroxide solution and saline equivalent, worthy of clinical promotion and use.