由于社会问题的复杂性和管理的局限性,“救火式”治理有时是不可避免的,但其不能成为治理主体的习惯和动辄使用的工具,更不能成为信仰。对于“救火式”治理的弊端,学界早有批评。但时至今日,为什么这种治理方式仍有市场甚至在一些地方还能大行其道呢?从“救火式”治理转向均衡式治理是一个复杂的系统工程,需经历较长的渐进推进过程。 Due to the complexity of social issues and the limitations of management, “fire-fighting” governance is sometimes unavoidable. However, it can not become a habit of government and a tool that can be used frequently and can not become a belief. For the “fire” governance drawbacks, the academic community has long been criticized. However, up to now, why is this kind of governance still popular in some markets? The shift from “firefighting ” to “balanced” governance is a complicated systematic project that needs to go through a long process of gradual progress.