论文部分内容阅读
日前,杭州娃哈哈食品有限公司(下称“食品公司”)与其中方股东之一、杭州娃哈哈集团有限公司(下称“集团公司”)就双方于1999年签订的商标使用许可合同的效力问题,正在贸仲进行仲裁。许可人集团公司认为,双方同时签订商标使用许可合同(下称“繁式合同”)及其附件之一简式使用许可合同(下称“简式合同”),旨在以合法形式掩盖非法目的,且“繁式合同”中约定的许可期限超出注册商标有效期限、违反了法律、法规的强制性规定,两份合同均应被认定无效。
Recently, Hangzhou Wahaha Food Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Food Company”) and one of its Chinese shareholders, Hangzhou Wahaha Group Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the “Group Company”) signed a trademark licensing agreement between the two parties in 1999 The validity of the issue, is arbitration. The licensor group company believes that both parties have signed a simple license agreement (hereinafter referred to as the “simple contract”) under the trademark licensing contract (hereinafter referred to as the “ The form obscures the illegal purpose, and ”Fancy contract " in the agreed period of permission is beyond the validity period of the registered trademark, in violation of the mandatory provisions of laws and regulations, both contracts should be found to be invalid.