广大中小学中,教师在日常考试批阅试卷时,往往加分制或减分制随意使用,认为只要总得分不错就行了,而更多的情况是使用减分制,因为这种方法简单些,易批阅,而批阅后,为求得“二次效应”,又往往发下试卷,让学生看失分所在,进行详细订正。殊不知,这减分制还是要慎用为好。首先是减分制不利于教育,那一个个错号“×”和一个个负号“-”,夸大地标明教师在评阅试卷时,着眼于单一地寻求学生答案中的错误和漏洞,以至于一些微小的不足。这样会挫伤学生学生的自尊心,影响学生的自信心,窒息学生的学习欲望,抑制学生的学习兴趣,使学生感到老师尽是找茬子,看不到学生的进步与成绩,造成师生间感情的鸿 In the majority of primary and secondary schools, teachers often use the bonus or credit system randomly when reviewing the examination papers on daily examinations. They think that as long as the total score is good, they will use more points because they are simpler. Easy review, and after the review, in order to obtain a “secondary effect”, the examination papers are often issued to allow students to see where the points are and to make detailed corrections. As everyone knows, this point system should be used with caution. The first is that the score reduction system is not conducive to education. One wrong sign “x” and one negative sign “-” are exaggerated. They mark the teacher’s quest for single-question errors and loopholes in the student’s answer when reviewing the papers. Some minor deficiencies. This will dampen student students’ self-esteem, affect students’ self-esteem, suffocate students’ learning desires, inhibit students’ interest in learning, and make them feel that teachers are trying to find flaws, fail to see students’ progress and achievements, and cause feelings between teachers and students. Hong