论文部分内容阅读
本文以英、美、法、德、日等五个法治发达国家作为分析样本,以诉讼解决机制、行政司法解决机制、行政申诉解决机制以及替代性纠纷解决机制等四大类纠纷解决机制为横切面,系统进行比较法研究;旨在总结发达法治国家(无论是大陆法系国家,还是普通法系国家)应对社会矛盾纠纷这一重大课题,所形成的成功经验并以之为鉴;从而为我国社会矛盾纠纷解决机制的完善,提供在法律制度史视野下,对域外制度文明(政治文明的核心部分)多个角度的思考。
Based on five developed countries such as Britain, the United States, France, Germany, Japan and other developed countries as the analysis sample, this dissertation focuses on four types of dispute resolution mechanisms: litigation settlement mechanism, administrative judicial settlement mechanism, administrative appeal resolution mechanism and alternative dispute resolution mechanism This article aims to summarize the successful experience of the developed countries in the rule of law (whether civil law countries or common law countries) in response to social conflicts and disputes, and draw lessons from them; The perfection of the mechanism for resolving social conflicts and disputes in our country provides a reflection on the perspectives of the system of civilized civilization (the core part of political civilization) from the perspective of the legal system history.