钱钟书对克罗齐的接受,由于只是散见于学术文本,而没有以专文专著形式呈现,不大为学界所知,然而其对克罗齐的引介与评价却全面而精准。既充分肯定克罗齐美学对文学主体性、自律性的维护与重视,以其为重要理论资源在具体文艺鉴赏时予以大量参考、引证,也对其唯心主义一元论美学观的“执心弃物”之弊进行不遗余力的纠谬与批判。此种接受终其一生一以贯之,以文为本,客观理性,对当前学术界无疑具有积极的借鉴意义。 Qian Zhongshu’s acceptance of Croce, as only scattered in the academic texts, but not in the form of monographs, is not known to the academic community, but its introduction and evaluation of Croce are comprehensive and accurate. Both fully affirmed the aesthetics of Croce on the literary subjectivity and self-discipline to maintain and value, with its important theoretical resources in specific literary appreciation of a large number of references, citation, but also on its idealist monist aesthetics of the “ Things ”of the drawbacks to spare no effort to correct and criticize. This kind of acceptance is consistent with its life-long, context-based and objective rationality. It undoubtedly has positive reference to the current academic community.