论文部分内容阅读
清初学者围绕《宋史.道学传》进行的争论,实乃宗奉程朱理学与崇尚阳明心学之间的学术思想之争。乾嘉时期的相关讨论,既体现了汉学发展和繁盛的大势,又显露出汉学与宋学趋向合流的征兆。道咸以后,宋学欲借相关讨论来实现重振,却最终与汉学一样陷入困局。这些都折射出清代学术思想演变、发展的轨迹和规律。
The debate among scholars in the early Qing Dynasty around the history of the Song dynasty was actually a controversy over the academic ideology between the Zong-Zhu Cheng-Cheng and Neo-Confucianism. The relevant discussions during the Qianghui and Jiaqing periods not only reflected the general trend of the development and prosperity of Sinology, but also revealed the tendency of the convergence of Sinology and Song Studies. After the salty, Song Xue-yan borrowed the relevant discussion to revive, but in the end he fell into a dilemma like Sinology. All of these reflect the trajectory and laws of the evolution and development of academic thought in the Qing Dynasty.