论文部分内容阅读
在我国社会主义市场经济日趋繁荣的今天,强迫交易罪的发生频率大幅增加。我国《刑法修正案(八)》对强迫交易罪进行了修订,进一步细化了强迫交易行为的表现形式。根据刑法“法无明文规定不为罪”的原则,某一行为构成犯罪,必须具备法律的明文规定。就强迫交易罪而言,其犯罪构成要件在司法实践中的适用产生了诸多问题,尤其是其客体和客观方面,这对于界定罪与非罪,此罪与彼罪,有着至关重要的影响。笔者结合在司法实践中处理案件遇到的问题,对相关困惑和难点加以分析,补充性的对强迫交易罪的构成要件加以分析,对强迫交易罪在司法实务环节与他罪的区分提出了一些意见。
At a time when the socialist market economy in our country is booming day by day, the frequency of forced transactional crimes has risen sharply. China’s “Criminal Law Amendment (8)” forcibly transacted the crime was amended to further refine the form of forced transactions. According to the criminal law “the law does not expressly provide for non-criminal” principle, an act constitutes a crime, must have the express provisions of law. As far as the crime of forced transaction is concerned, the application of its constitutional elements in judicial practice poses many problems, especially its objectivity and objective aspects, which are of crucial importance in defining crimes and non-crimes . The author combines the problems encountered in handling cases in judicial practice, analyzes the related puzzles and difficulties, supplements the constitutional elements of the crime of forced transaction, and puts forward some suggestions on the discrimination of the crime of forced transaction in judicial practice. opinion.