论文部分内容阅读
疑罪,牵涉实体与程序,连接理论与实务,关系人权和正义。由于通说及立法的放大效应,“事实疑罪”目前一枝独秀。罪、非罪或者疑罪,作为一个法律判断,需要将事实置于规范之下进行法律评价。得出何种结论,与事实和规范都有关系。这就需要保持疑罪问题的独立性,从法理上探讨疑罪的本质。以法学方法论为工具,循规范适用的足迹,定位疑罪的存在空间,对疑罪本质进行理性思考。事实和法律都应该是疑罪发生的原因。
Suspected of sin, involving entities and procedures, linking theory and practice, human rights and justice. Due to the general effect of legislation and enactment, “factual suspect ” is currently outshone. Sin, non-sin or suspect sin, as a legal judgment, need to put facts under the norms for legal evaluation. What conclusions are drawn are related to facts and norms. This needs to maintain the independence of the question of doubt and to probe the essence of the crime of doubt from the jurisprudence. Using legal methodology as a tool, following the applicable footprints of the standard, positioning the existence space of suspected crimes, and rationally thinking about the nature of suspected crimes. Facts and laws should be the reason for the crime.