论文部分内容阅读
在科技界,科学家会给每一个科技术语一个明确的定义。但机器人问世已有几十年,其定义却仍然是仁者见仁、智者见智、无法统一。原因之一是机器人还在发展,新的机型、新的功能不断涌现;但根本的原因在于机器人涉及到了“人”的概念,成为一个难以回答的哲学问题。就像机器人一词最早诞生于科幻小说中一样, 人们对机器人充满了幻想。也许正是由于机器人定义的模糊,才给了人们充分的想象和创造空间。例如,为了防止机器人伤害人类,科幻作家阿西莫夫于1940年就创造出了“机器人三原则”:首先,机器人不应伤害人类;其次,机器人应遵守人类的命令,与第一条违背的命令除外;第三,机器人应能保护自己,与第一条相抵触者除外。
In science and technology, scientists will give a clear definition of each of the technical terms. But robots have been around for decades, and their definition is still benevolent see, benevolent wise, can not be unified. One of the reasons is that robots are still developing. New models and new functions are emerging. But the fundamental reason is that the robot involves the concept of “human” and becomes a philosophical problem that can not be answered. Just as the term robot was originally born in science fiction, people are full of fantasy about robots. Perhaps it is precisely because of the fuzzy definition of the robot, it gives people enough imagination and create space. For example, in order to prevent robots from injuring humans, the science fiction writer Asimov created the “three principles of robotics” in 1940: first, robots should not harm humans; second, robots should obey orders from human beings, in contravention of the first violation Except the order; thirdly, robots should be able to protect themselves except in the first case.