本文考察法国《公共健康法》对冷冻胚胎死后移植规定的立法过程、立法理由和立法异议,发现法国立法者优先考虑出生孩子是否具备父母双全的家庭环境,母亲的成熟与抚养能力与社会的成本,而不是丈夫、妻子的生育权、生育计划,孩子出生的利益,妻子的精神痛苦以及孩子作为家族血脉载体,寄托着家族传宗接代、香火相传的希望等因素,与我国首例人工胚胎权属纠纷案,法官在利益平衡时首先考虑人伦、情感、特殊利益保护等因素形成鲜明的对比。本文不认同法国的立法规定,认为其过分注重孩子的成长环境,忽略了丈夫和妻子的利益。在冷冻胚胎利益的研究中,有主张借鉴国外实践的科研成果,法国冷冻胚胎死后移植的立法启示我们,在此类问题上,借鉴的同时要立足本国历史、文化。 This article examines the legislative process, legislative reasons and legislative objections of the French Public Health Law to the post-mortem transplant of frozen embryos and finds that French legislators give priority to considering whether the children born in the family have a family environment with both parents, the maturity and supportive ability of the mother and the social Cost, rather than the husband, his wife’s reproductive rights, reproductive planning, the child’s interest in the birth, the wife’s spiritual pain and the child as a family veteran carrier, entrusted with the family lineage generation, hope of incense and other factors, and China’s first artificial embryo rights Disputes, the judge in the balance of interests first consider the human relations, emotions, protection of special interests and other factors in stark contrast. This article does not agree with the French legislative provisions, that it places undue emphasis on children’s growth environment, ignoring the interests of husband and wife. In the research on the benefits of frozen embryos, there are scientific research that advocates learning from foreign practices and the legislation on post-mortem transplantation of frozen embryos in France enlightens us. On such issues, we must learn from the history and culture of our own country.