论文部分内容阅读
目的掌握普兰店区教育机构食堂餐具消毒情况,分析餐具消毒检测结果及影响因素,提出相应建议。方法对教育机构消毒餐具随机抽样检测,采用大肠菌群快速检验纸片法进行检测。结果共检测学校及幼儿园食堂107所,检测餐具1236份,合格965份,合格率为78.07%;其中高级中学(88.78%)、初级中学(82.39%)、小学(74.60%)和幼儿园(69.85%)的食堂餐具消毒合格率差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);碗(77.11%)、快餐盘(盒)(76.14%)、勺(84.88%)、筷子(71.31%)和盆(69.77%)的消毒合格率差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);煮沸蒸汽(87.35%)、红外线消毒柜(69.89%)和含氯制剂(70.03%)不同方法消毒合格率差异有统计学意义(P<0.01),使用红外线消毒柜和含氯制剂消毒的餐具合格率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);消毒餐具存放在保洁柜与其它位置存放的餐具合格率差异有统计学意义(P<0.01))。结论普兰店区教育机构食堂餐具消毒合格率低,应重视和加强我区教育机构食堂餐具消毒管理工作。
Objective To understand the disinfection of tableware in education institutions in Pulandian district, analyze the results of disinfection test and influencing factors and put forward corresponding suggestions. Methods The disinfection tableware of educational institutions were randomly sampled and tested, and colloidal colony was used to test the paper method. Results A total of 107 schools and kindergartens canteens were detected, measuring 1236 pieces of tableware and 965 pieces with a passing rate of 78.07%. Among them, 88.78% were senior high schools, 82.39% were junior high schools, 74.60% were primary schools, and 69.85% (77.11%), fast food trays (76.14%), scoops (84.88%), chopsticks (71.31%) and pots (69.77% ) (P <0.05). There was significant difference in disinfection pass rate between boiling steam (87.35%), infrared disinfection cabinet (69.89%) and chlorine-containing preparation (70.03% <0.01). There was no significant difference in the passing rate of tableware disinfected with infrared disinfection cabinet and chlorine containing preparations (P> 0.05). There was a significant difference in the pass rate of tableware stored in disinfection tableware and other places (P < 0.01)). Conclusion Pulandian district education institutions canteen tableware disinfection pass rate is low, we should pay attention to and strengthen the education institutions canteen tableware disinfection management.