论文部分内容阅读
“民商合一”和“民商分立”的立法模式本身无对错之分,但对于调整特殊商事法律关系,笼统的将民法相关规定整体性套入,具有优劣之别。因此,转型时期的民法典编纂,在确立“民商合一”的模式下,更应该给以商法制度的创新的空间。民法典须做到有所为、有所不为,打破糅合式民商关系,制定一部中国的商事通则,汇编中国商事法律,以为将来的商法典做好准备。
There is no right or wrong distinction between the legislative mode of “civil and commercial integration” and “civil and commercial separation”, but there is no difference between adjusting the legal relations of special commercial law and generalizing the relevant provisions of civil law in general. . Therefore, the codification of the civil code in the transitional period should give room for innovation in the commercial law system even under the mode of establishing “civil-commercial integration.” The civil code must do something, do something, break the mix of civil and commercial relations, the development of a general business rules of China, the compilation of Chinese commercial law, in order to prepare for future commercial code.