国内有关哈尼族的研究近年来硕果累累,但有的论著中对某些史料的理解存在误区。本文以原始资料为依据,针对哈尼族研究中涉及到的《尚书·禹贡》记载与梯田的关系,明初黔西北、滇东北有无“和泥芒部府”,康熙时参与反清起义的龙韬之地位与族属三个问题,进行了相关的考证分析,提出了不同于以往的看法。 The research on the Hani nationality in China has achieved great success in recent years, but there are some errors in the understanding of some historical materials in some treatises. In this paper, based on the original data, in view of the relationship between “Shang Shu Yu Gong” and terraces involved in the study of Hani ethnic groups, whether there is " Long Tao’s status and ethnic three issues, carried out the relevant textual analysis, put forward different from the previous view.