分级干预对乳腺癌患者知觉压力及焦虑抑郁的影响

来源 :社区医学杂志 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:shulang198851
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨分级干预对乳腺癌患者知觉压力及焦虑抑郁的影响。方法选择2014年3月—2016年3月收治的乳腺癌患者100例,随机分为干预组与对照组,每组50例。对照组给予常规心理护理及健康教育,干预组在对照组基础上给予分级干预,采用压力知觉量表(Chinese version peiceived scale,CPSS)对患者的压力进行评分,采用焦虑自评量表(self-rating anxiety scale,SAS)对焦虑状态进行评分,采用抑郁自评量表(self-rating depression scale,SDS)对抑郁状态进行评分;对比干预前后两组CPSS、SAS、SDS评分情况;比较干预前后两组压力、焦虑、抑郁分级情况。计量资料比较采用t检验,等级资料比较采用秩和检验,P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。结果干预前两组CPSS、SAS、SDS评分比较差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。干预后对照组CPSS、SAS、SDS评分[(39.01±5.12)、(47.90±5.74)、(53.90±4.47)分]与干预前[(39.41±5.06)、(47.93±5.81)、(54.15±4.96)分]比较差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。干预后干预组[(33.94±5.40)、(43.06±5.01)、(44.05±5.12)分]与干预前[(39.27±4.97)、(48.01±5.53)、(53.30±5.04)分]、对照组比较差异有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。干预前两组压力、焦虑、抑郁分级比较差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。干预后对照组压力、焦虑、抑郁分级与干预前比较差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。干预后干预组压力、焦虑、抑郁分级与干预前、对照组比较差异有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。结论分级干预可有效减轻乳腺癌患者的知觉压力,改善其焦虑抑郁状态。 Objective To investigate the effect of grading intervention on the patients with breast cancer and the anxiety and depression. Methods 100 cases of breast cancer patients who were treated from March 2014 to March 2016 were randomly divided into intervention group and control group with 50 cases in each group. The control group was given routine psychological nursing and health education. The intervention group was graded on the basis of the control group, and the stress was assessed by using the Chinese version of peiceived scale (CPSS). The self-rating anxiety scale (self- rating anxiety scale (SAS) was used to evaluate the anxiety state. The depression status was scored by self-rating depression scale (SDS). The scores of CPSS, SAS and SDS before and after the intervention were compared. Group stress, anxiety, depression grade. Comparison of measurement data using t test, rank data comparison using rank sum test, P <0.05 for the difference was statistically significant. Results There was no significant difference in the scores of CPSS, SAS and SDS between the two groups before intervention (all P> 0.05). After intervention, the scores of CPSS, SAS and SDS in the control group [(39.01 ± 5.12), (47.90 ± 5.74) and (53.90 ± 4.47) points] were significantly higher than those before intervention [(39.41 ± 5.06), (47.93 ± 5.81), (54.15 ± 4.96 ) Points compared with no significant difference (all P> 0.05). After intervention, the intervention group (33.94 ± 5.40), (43.06 ± 5.01), (44.05 ± 5.12) and intervention group (39.27 ± 4.97), (48.01 ± 5.53) and (53.30 ± 5.04) The difference was statistically significant (all P <0.05). There was no significant difference in pressure, anxiety and depression between the two groups before intervention (all P> 0.05). There was no significant difference in pressure, anxiety and depression between the two groups after intervention (P> 0.05). After intervention, the scores of stress, anxiety and depression in intervention group were significantly different from those in control group before intervention (all P <0.05). Conclusions Grading intervention can effectively relieve the sensory stress in patients with breast cancer and improve their anxiety and depression status.
其他文献
概括是指人们把对事物感知获得的信息,通过分析、综合、比较、抽象,将其内部特征或本质属性归结力精要概念的逻辑思维过程。人们在进行这一思维过程中的智力水平就是概括能
目的分析儿童支气管肺炎住院费用的影响因素,为降低住院费用提供对策。方法采用回顾性研究方法,收集山西省内三所地市级儿童医院2014年4 080例患支气管肺炎儿童住院资料,采用
物流企业所提供的综合化的物流服务使整个经济的运行效率大大提升,物流已经成为社会经济发展的重要组成部分。而中小物流企业因为自身抵抗风险的能力有限,因而在参与经济活动
在近代以前的欧洲社会里,婚姻作为维护家族利益的工具,无论是名誉的维持还是财产的保障都必须是"适宜的"。这种适宜表现之一就是门当户对。而在奥斯丁笔下"门第"不仅涉及出身,更
新时期的市场激烈的竞争,最激烈的人才之间的竞争。人才的竞争,实质上就是学习能力和组织能力的竞争,要求一个组织的学习速度和自创未来能力要比自己竞争对手更强,在处于知识
词汇教学是英语教学的基础,是英语教学中必不可少的部分;卡片式词汇教学是一种传统的、有效的英语词汇教学方式。本文就卡片英语词汇教学法的理论支持、理论指导做了探讨和分析
一、培养创新精神是实施素质教育的重点培养创新人才已成为知识经济时代教育发展的根本要求.但是,创新教育、创新人才培养在我国教育中还有很多欠缺.我国传统的教育固然使学
目的探讨间质细胞衍生因子-1(SDF-1)及神经生长因子(NGF)在胶质瘤中的表达及临床意义。方法收集手术切除的人脑胶质瘤病理标本86例为观察组,其中观察组按不同病理级别分为Ⅰ级15
分析了含砂天然气介质用平板闸阀存在的问题,介绍了抗砂耐磨密封副结构的改进及设计,论述了阀门检测试验标准、要求和结果。
该文论述乳化剂与小麦面粉蛋白质作用机理、作用方式及作用历程,同时,还讨论影响二者相互作用效果因素.作用机理包括乳化剂与蛋白质复合物研究、相行为和混合体系界面吸附;作