论文部分内容阅读
早在2011年,屠呦呦获得有诺贝尔奖风向标之称的美国拉斯克奖,就曾引起中国舆论的深度关注和讨论。此次她获得诺贝尔生理学或医学奖,引发了更多的讨论。屠呦呦无博士学位、也无海外留学背景、头顶上更无中国两院院士头衔,被很多人戏称为“三无人员”。她连续获得拉斯克奖与诺贝尔奖,无论对科学研究本身还是对当前科研评价体制,都提出了令人深思的问题。由于人文社科研究与科学研究有所不同,本文主要讨论科学研究及其评价问题。
As early as 2011, Tu Yo Yo won the Nobel Prize winner of the Las Vegas Award, which has aroused the deep concern of Chinese media and discussion. This time she won the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine, triggering more discussion. Tu Yo Yo no doctorate, nor overseas study background, more Chinese head of the academician title, was a lot of people jokingly called “three no staff ”. She won the Lasker Award and the Nobel Prize consecutively, both for scientific research and for the current system of scientific research and evaluation, all put forward thought-provoking questions. Due to the difference between humanities and social science research and scientific research, this article mainly discusses the scientific research and its evaluation.