论文部分内容阅读
有些事情是不能深想的,如果深想常常脑海中就会冒出一些“?”来。譬如1988年10月23日解放日报登载的金文明诉罗竹风侵犯著作权案败诉一则消息,读后就引起了我的一些联想。罗竹风作为《汉语大词典》主编,因工作需要请金文明等工作人员代为起草《试论语文词典的编篡工作》一文,言明此文以罗个人名义在中国语言学会成立大会上作为发言稿之用。可是待到罗竹风在大会上发了言,并以个人名义在书刊上发表此文后,金文明便向法院诉罗竹风侵犯著作权。法院判决
Some things can not be deep thought, if you often think of mind will emerge some “?” Come. For example, on June 23, 1988, the Liberation Daily published Jin Wenming v. Luo Bamboo Wind infringes on the copyright case and loses a message. After reading, it aroused some of my associations. Luo bamboo wind as a “Chinese Dictionary” editor, due to work needs, such as Kim Young-ming and other staff on behalf of the drafting of “on the compilation of Chinese dictionary work,” a text, this article in the name of Luo in the establishment of the Chinese Language Association Conference as a speech use. However, until Luo bamboo wind made a speech at the conference, and in his own name in the journals published this article, Jin Wenming complained to the court bamboo wind copyright infringement. Court decision