论文部分内容阅读
【目的】了解学术不端文章与其作者所在机构、作者的职称、学历等因素与之间的相关性,为编辑部初审提供参考。【方法】以《岩土力学》在线网站2014年收到的3032篇文章为统计样本,按照第一作者所在机构、职称、学历为统计指标对包括被发现的34篇有学术不端行为在内的文章进行了分类统计。【结果】来自985高校、211高校及中科院作者的稿件,出现学术不端的比例最低,来自勘测设计施工单位作者的稿件发生学术不端的比例最高,来自一般高校和专业研究院作者的稿件出现学术不端的比例介于前两者之间。副高职称和中级职称作者的文章发生学术不端的比例远高于正高级职称作者和中级以下职称作者。作者的学历高低与其文章出现学术不端的比例的高低没有相关关系。【结论】在审稿过程中,对来自勘测设计施工单位或专业研究院的稿件,特别是中级或副高职称作者的稿件,应该仔细审稿。靠作者自身的学术道德修养来抑制学术不端文章的出现是不现实的,制定约束学术不端的行为的准则或立法是铲除这一顽疾的根本措施。
【Objective】 To understand the correlation between academic misconduct and the author’s institution, author’s title, academic qualifications and other factors, and to provide reference for editorial board’s preliminary examination. 【Method】 According to 3032 articles received by the website of “Geotechnical Mechanics” in 2014 as statistical samples, according to the first author’s institution, professional title and academic record as statistical indicators, including 34 found academic misconduct The article conducted a classification statistics. 【Results】 The percentage of academic misconduct in the manuscripts submitted by 985 universities, 211 universities and Chinese Academy of Sciences was the lowest. The highest percentage of academic misconduct was found in manuscripts from authors of survey, design and construction units, and the academic records of manuscripts from authors of colleges and professional institutes End of the ratio between the first two. The proportion of academic misconduct in articles with titles of vice-titles and intermediate titles is much higher than that of authors with titles of senior titles and titles of titles below mid-level. There is no correlation between the author’s academic record and the level of academic misconduct in his article. 【Conclusion】 During the process of reviewing manuscripts, manuscripts from survey, design and construction institutes or professional institutes, especially manuscripts of intermediate or senior titles, should be reviewed carefully. It is unrealistic to restrain the appearance of academic misconduct by the author’s own academic morality. The establishment of norms or legislation to restrain academic misconduct is the fundamental measure to eradicate this stubborn illness.