论文部分内容阅读
在当前的美术刊物上,针对创作实践的批评总是占有大量篇幅。问题是,这些批评的学术含量如何?它究竟在多大程度上解释了作品并激活了创作?它对青年美术家又有着怎样的影响?本期,一位青年学者就此问题发表了看法。“傅抱石奖·南京水墨画传媒三年展”系列活动开展以来,因其鲜明的探索色彩而在海内外引起了较大的反响。本期刊发的《“多元”之惑》一文对该项活动的某些理论阐述表达了不同的意见。文章的视角同时触及新时期以来南京中国画坛的动态,虽是一家之见,但表达了对文化建设的关注。
In current art journals, critics of creative practice always occupy a lot of space. The question is, what is the academic content of these critiques, to what extent does it explain the work and activate it, and how does it affect young artists? In this issue, a young scholar expressed his opinion on the issue. “Fu Baoshi Award, Nanjing Ink Painting Media Triennial ” series of activities since its distinctive exploration of color at home and abroad caused a greater response. This issue of “” pluralism “confusion ” article on the activity of some of the theoretical expression expressed different views. Although the article’s perspective touches on the dynamics of the Nanjing Chinese painting society since the new era, it is one opinion, but it expresses the concern for cultural construction.