An Epic Work Filling Blacks in Human Rights Research in China’s Academia

来源 :中国法律 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:dingchao0907
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
  The final achievement of the National Social Science Foundation Post-funded Project, The Study of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights written by Sun Pinghua, Associate Professor of China University of Political Science and Law (CUPL), was published by Peking University Press in August 2012. In sextodecimo size, the book contains 440 pages and is priced RMB 50 yuan. Filling the blanks of academic studies in China both theoretically and practically, the book addresses a subject of both historical significance and practical value. Broad in vision, scientific in method, rich in content, rigorous in structure, careful in argument, the work unfolds the historical origin, formulating process, text wording, substantive content and legal status of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR or Declaration) from an interdisciplinary perspective of history, philosophy, law, language and so on. Expounding the implementation of the declaration at national, regional and the UN levels, the book, an epic work in China’s human rights research, elaborates fundamental principles of achieving international human rights standards in China and puts forward concrete measures to improve China’s human rights protection.
  Firstly, the topic selected in the book is of great research value, which is also the common concern of all the mankind. As the earliest and most influential document on human rights issued by the UN General Assembly, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights possesses epoch-making significance to the whole human society throughout the international human rights history. As a common standard of achievement for all peoples and all nations, it lays solid foundations for human rights legislation at the national, regional and UN levels, and stands as a cornerstone for international human rights law and international human rights protection system, and even plays a role of a milestone in human history. In Preface II, Professor Yang Yuguan points out: “The Declaration, elaborating on interpersonal relationship and the relationship between the individual and the government, solemnly proclaims the rights of every natural person in the world; being the most authoritative document in human rights in contemporary time, from which all the subsequent international human rights conventions and instruments origin, it provides the legislative basis for human rights. The Declaration is a monumental document of profound practical and historic significance in human history.” (See the second page of Preface II in The Study of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights). It is just because of the extreme importance of this document that the present study finds its great value. In the meanwhile, prior to the work by Professor Sun, no systematic research into this document highlights the necessity and urgency of this study and also reinforces the significance of this research. The present research “has important practical significance for China to further hold high the banner of human rights, to promote the development of the human rights cause, and enhance the right to speak and domination in the field of international human rights.” (See the first page of Preface I by Professor Dong Yunhu)
  Secondly, the book adopts scientific research methods, where the author, with rigorous academic attitude, unfolds a panorama of human rights protection system. For example, in quest of the historical origin of the Declaration, the author explains to readers nonwestern cultural traditions and human rights concepts when summarizing of the history of western philosophy from the evolvement of “natural rights” to the traditions and practices of human rights and the rule of law in Britain, France and the United States, thereby providing an in-depth analysis of the origin of the Declaration. As another example, in the textual studies of the Declaration, the author conducts in-depth investigations after posing the question. In order to explore the sources of different versions of the document, the author almost exhausts all the relevant literature; and in order to fully appreciate the exact textual wording, the author employs triangulation and later provides a suggested Chinese version after detailed comparison and analysis of the Chinese authentic version, Chinese popular version, English version and French version. In the meanwhile, the author adopts such research methods as literature studies, historical research, comparison, triangulation, comprehensive analysis and case studies. The multi-method research not only ensures the in-depth study in different areas, but also adds the academic value of the study. Professor Dong Yunhu thinks highly of the case study adopted as one of the innovative aspects of the book, and points out that “it is the first allround case study of the Declaration and is of certain referential significance for conducting case studies of other international human rights instruments” (See the second page of Preface I). If it reveals its high academic value ontologically, the book depicts the landscapes of human rights legislation and human rights protection at national, regional and UN levels from a practical perspective. From the successful use of a variety of research methods, we can easily see that the author’s rigorous attitude and his superb ability to control and flexibility to conduct a multi-method research has no doubt played a role during the research, which can not be underestimated.
  Thirdly, rich in content, rigorous in structure, and meticulous in argumentation, the book presents a thorough analysis of the UDHR from an interdisciplinary perspective. The author can discuss the historical origin, formulating process, textual wording, substantive content and legal status of the Declaration with each part interrelated logically and systematically, leading to further analysis of the researched document, thereby not only maintaining the general direction of the research but also unraveling the origin, course, text, context and status of the Declaration. In addition to the ontological discussions, the author also explores the implementation of the Declaration at the national, regional and UN levels, thus revealing the importance of the document throughout the human history. Stretching into the history of western philosophy and the human rights concepts in non-western cultures, the book expounds and proves systematically and objectively for the first time the tremendous efforts made by Chinese representative Zhang Pengchun while the Declaration was drafted, which makes itself an outstanding achievement in both China’s academie and international human rights researches. Notably, the book dedicates a chapter on human rights progress in China. In this chapter we can find an in-depth study of the background, drafting, text, features and significance of China’s first white paper on human rights, a detailed discussion on including “the state respects and safeguards human rights” into the constitution, and a thorough elaboration on the fundamental principles to achieve international human rights standards and the concrete measures to improve human rights protection in China. From the ontological analysis to the implementation in practice, from the international level to the regional and national levels, from the comparison between the status quo of human rights in China and the human rights standards in the Declaration to putting forward fundamental principles to achieve international human rights standards and concrete measures to improve human rights protection in China. The entire argument involves a number of disciplines and shows the insight of the author’s multidisciplinary research. As Dr. Michael Addo, Member of the United Nations Working Group on the Issue of Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises, comments in Preface III: “The multidisciplinary approach adopted by the author, in terms of engaging with the philosophy, politics, history and the law is particularly valuable asset. Above all else, it is structured well and therefore accessible to all levels of audiences.” (See Preface III) In addition, since its recent publication, the book has found itself falling into different book categories in libraries different universities and bookstores, say, international political science, international relations, social science, law and even human rights law. Though these categorizations are neither standardized nor normalized, this phenomenon per se reveals that the present work has an interdisciplinary horizon and becomes an important part of China human rights law research, exerting a positive impact on different disciplines.
  Fourthly, the author’s language virtuosity makes deliberation of the over four thousand hundred characters a model of language use. Professor Sun Pinghua, leading researcher in English Language and Literature in CUPL School of Foreign languages, who achieved BA dual degree in English and Chinese, has years of English language editing experience in Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press as a senior editor. Professor Sun also achieved MA in English Language and Literature at Beijing Normal University, MA in English Language Teaching at the University of Warwick and PhD in Human Rights (the first doctor of human rights law at CUPL and in China as well). As a visiting scholar in the United Kingdom, Professor Sun taught a postgraduate course “Human Rights in China” at the Law School in the University of Exeter Law. A host of experiences in English language help to forge Professor Sun’s language superiority and research ability. The comparison and analysis on Chinese, English and French versions of the Declaration demonstrates his strong language skills and research talents. It is noteworthy that Professor Sun’s application for “2012 National Social Science Fund: Chinese Academic Translation Project” has been approved, whose final achievement will be published as an English monograph in Britain; on the other hand, the fruit (Chinese Wisdom in Establishing International Human Rights Regime) of another international cooperative research project during his visit in Britain has been scheduled to publish by Springer, the largest European publisher. The final fruit mentioned above will be published in Germany, and distributed in European countries and the world. Michael Addo, expert of Special Procedures of the UN Human Rights Council, commends Professor Sun’s exceptional work as follows: “This is an original research filling in the blanks in the research field of international human rights.” which truly indicates the broadening vision and deepening research of the author. Nonetheless, Professor Sun’s indefatigable diligence, rigorous academic attitude and noble life pursuit contribute to his outstanding achievements. In short, it is delighted to see that the author has attained a commanding height in human right law research through taking advantage of his language superiority, and has successfully bridged a gap in China’s research of human rights law, thereby setting up an example for human rights law research in China.
  Finally, as a crucial academic masterpiece for further references, the book will contribute a great deal to China’s human rights theoretical construction. Though after years of theoretical exploration, generally speaking, great efforts should be made to develop the Chinese theoretical system of human rights. In addition, further efforts should be committed to China’s human rights theoretical development since no consensus has been reached in major theoretical issues. The time counts on us to accomplish the construction of human rights protection theoretical system. In Professor Sun Pinghua’s The Study of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, we see positive explorations in China’s human rights theoretical construction. This book provides us not only insightful analysis of the Declaration but also new ideas and concepts through comparison and discussion, concerning international human rights mechanism and China’s human rights protection achievements, which lies in the core of the original research. However, as professor Dong Yunhu describes in Preface I, “China’s human rights cause is in the ascendant, and there is a long way to go in China.” The author of the book has made his own contributions in the field of human rights studies, and we are looking forward to the author’s more excellent results published and making newer and greater contributions to constructing human rights protection system with Chinese characteristics and the progress and development of the cause of human rights protection for all mankind.
其他文献
前言  國際投資的形式:我們通常將國際投資的形式分為被動性的投資,即購買股票、債券和其他證券,和外國直接投资形式,即外國投資者採取積極參與管理其投資的形式。國際投資可以採取多種方式:一些通常的做法是購買有形和無形資產;
期刊
爲应对人口老龄化带来的一系列社会问题,老年人权益保障法修改工作提上议事日程。2012年6月26日,备受关注的老年人权益保障法(修订草案)首次提请全国人大常委会审议。从现行老年法6章50条扩展到法律修改草案9章86条,新设养老服务、社会优待和宜居环境3章,新增38条并修改38条,老年法(修改草案)几近「脱胎换骨」。老年人权益保障法修改草案有很多亮点,比如,确立积极应对人口老龄化基本国策或者说国家战略
期刊
物權法是關係到重大國計民生的基本法律,是為社會主義市場經濟的基本法律制度,也是我國社會主義市場經濟法律體系中的重要組成部分。
期刊
一、引言  植物新品種是植物育種者智力勞動的結晶,因而與發明創造、作品等智力創造性成果一樣屬於知識產權保護的客體。建立保護植物新品種的知識產權保護制度,成為各國以及國際公約鼓勵對植物新品種的研究,保護植物育種者的合法權益,促進植物新品種的創造和利用的重要法律制度。
期刊
《物權:規範與學說——以中國物權法的解釋論為中心》(上、下冊)入選2012年「三個一百」原創圖書出版工程
期刊
I. Characteristics of Small and Micro-sized Enterprises  In the first half of 2011, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the National Bureau of Statistics, the National Development and
期刊
一、立法目的之考量  不动产承租人的优先购买权制度赋予了不动产租赁权优先於一般债权的物权般的优先效力,立法究竟出於何种考虑不无疑问。  (一)域外立法  1.德国  德国民法典第577条规定了承租人的先买权:(1)在交付给承租人後已设立或者将要设立住宅区分所有权的出租的住房,在被出卖给第三人时,承租人有优先买受的权利。出租人将住房出卖给家属或属於其家计的人的,不适用前句的规定;除基於以下各款发生其
期刊
5. The Awareness of the present  Judicial reform is a long term progressing and deepening process, which takes on the characteristic of many phases. As the saying goes “Good governance can adjust and
期刊
In response to a series of social problems posed by the aging of the population, the amendment to the Law on the Protection of the Rights and Interests of Senior Citizens has been put on the agenda. O
期刊
As a new term of grass-roots representatives is elected, the authority, media and active citizens, who act as their own characters, take part in the regular election with their own appeals, in the pol
期刊