论文部分内容阅读
编辑出版马克思恩格斯共同的全集这个原则决定并不是理所当然地形成的,国际马克思恩格斯研究学界对此一直有争议,有人主张编辑出版马克思和恩格斯各自的全集,甚至批判共同的全集纯粹是政治意识形态的产物。本文以一篇批判性评论作导引,用丰富的史料和翔实的文献资料论述马克思和恩格斯持久而深入的合作所具备的特殊情况和前提,并进一步从基本原则、创作阶段的区分、编辑原则的灵活性、作者授权的问题、作者身份确定的问题和对注释索引的特定要求六个方面探讨接受这一原则决定的重要前提,认为编辑共同的全集不仅可行,而且是有根据的。
Editing and publishing the common compilation of Marx and Engels is not taken for granted. The international Marx and Engels academic circles have always been controversial. Some people advocate editing and publishing the complete works of Marx and Engels, and even criticize the common corpus for purely political ideology product. This article, guided by a critical commentary, elaborates the special circumstances and prerequisites for lasting and in-depth cooperation between Marx and Engels through abundant historical materials and informative documents, and further analyzes the basic principles, the distinction between the creative stages and the editorial principles Flexibility, authored author’s issue, author’s identity, and the specific requirements of the indexed index. This article discusses the important preconditions for accepting this principle decision. It is considered that it is not only feasible but also valid to compile a common set of editors.