一起医疗纠纷,一份权威机构的法医鉴定认为,医院操作符合医疗常规,依照这份鉴定,医院不需要承担任何赔偿责任;而另一份权威机构的法医鉴定认为,医院过错非常严重,导致患者构成三级伤残。面对这样两份鉴定结果迥异的法医鉴定,法院该如何取舍,如何定案才显示公平? A medical dispute, a forensic examination of the authority that the hospital operating in line with medical practice, in accordance with this identification, the hospital does not need to assume any liability; and another authoritative body forensic assessment that the hospital is very serious fault, leading to patients Constitute three levels of disability. In the face of such two different forensic identification of appraisal results, how to choose the court, how to determine the case before the show fair?