论文部分内容阅读
历来针对南非作家J.M.库切的作品《福》的评论,只是关注到女性苏珊对父权话语和男性作者权威的颠覆意义,而忽视具备白人女性双重身份的苏珊失败的结局。本文从女性主义和后殖民主义的角度出发,认为作为女性的苏珊在经济上一直依附于男性,苏珊非但不能成功克服女性作者身份焦虑,而且拥有白人身份的她也无法为同属弱者的星期五言说历史。经济上的附庸地位和本质上的殖民者身份使得苏珊与白人男性福同谋,利用话语作为殖民工具,奴役被殖民者星期五,最终自己的声音也被抹杀在文本中。
Historically, the commentary on the “blessing” of South African writer J.M.Cuchet focuses only on the subversion of women’s susan’s discourse on patriarchal discourse and the authority of male authors, while ignoring the unsuccessful conclusion of Susan, who possesses the dual identities of white women. This article, from the perspective of feminism and post-colonialism, considers Susan, as a female, economically dependent on men. Susan not only failed to overcome the anxiety of female authors, but also she could not be a weak person on Friday Speak history. Economic subordination and essentially colonial identity led Susan to complicity with white manhood, use discourse as a colonial tool, enslave the colonized by Friday, and eventually silence his own voice in the text.