论文部分内容阅读
最高人民法院在对自首的“其他罪行”的司法解释第四条之规定排除了同种类罪行,在理论方面,它违反了罪刑法定原则和“期待可能性”理论,在实践中,也既不利于犯罪嫌疑人(被告人)悔罪自新,也不利于司法工作效率和质量,司法解释应当严格遵照刑法的相关规定,司法解释第四条是没有法理基础和实践基础限制性解释,应予以废止,回归刑法本意。
The Supreme People’s Court ruled out crimes of the same kind in the provisions of Article 4 of the judicial interpretation of “other crimes” of the surrender party. In theory, it violated the statutory principle of crime and punishment and the “expectation possibility” theory. In practice, Is not conducive to the criminal suspects (defendants) regret it, nor is it conducive to the efficiency and quality of judicial work, judicial interpretations should be in strict accordance with the relevant provisions of criminal law, judicial interpretation of Article 4 is no legal basis and practical basis for the interpretation of restrictions , Should be abolished, return to the original intention of criminal law.