论文部分内容阅读
经营者反竞争行为的抗辩事由贯穿于竞争法的整个制度体系中。制度和理论上尚未给出反竞争行为抗辩事由的一般定义,导致法律适用容易出现偏差,制度散乱,体系化不足,一些立法的逻辑不严密,因此我们非常有必要归纳经营者反竞争行为抗辩事由的一般定义。经营者反竞争行为的抗辩事由可以归纳为反竞争行为在满足正常经营所需和促进公共利益两方面的积极作用。这一定义符合竞争法的基本原理,也与现有的列举式规定相兼容,因而是恰当的。存在抗辩事由不代表反竞争行为一定合法,还需要更大框架内的经济分析。如果反竞争行为利大于弊,则可以得到竞争法的豁免。
The defenses of anti-competitive behavior of operators run through the whole system of competition law. System and theory have not yet given a defensive cause of anti-competitive behavior of the general definition, leading to the law prone to deviation, the system scattered, inadequate system, some of the logic of the law is not rigorous, so it is very necessary for us to sue the defenses of anti-competitive behavior The general definition. The defenses of the anti-competitive behavior of the operator can be summed up as the positive role of anti-competitive behavior in meeting the needs of normal operation and promoting the public interest. This definition is consistent with the rationale of competition law and is compatible with the existing enumeration rules. The existence of a defense does not mean that anti-competitive behavior must be lawful, but a more extensive economic analysis is needed. If anticompetitive benefits outweigh the disadvantages, they can be exempted from competition law.