论文部分内容阅读
近日,云南省政府杨鹏撰文分析,尽管实施了大力度的财政政策,并相应调整了货币政策,但启动内需的目的却并未达到,其中以下因素值得注意: 一、财政政策和货币政策的主要受益人并非低收入阶层 不同收入阶层的消费倾向不同,高收入阶层的边际消费倾向较低,低收入阶层的潜在消费需求较大,但如果没有实际收入的增加,潜在消费需求不能转化为现实消费需求。1998年以来社会商品零售总额增幅持续回落,说明社会总体边际消费倾向降低,同时说明在其他改革措施不配套的情况下,财政政策和货币政策的真正受益人不是低收入阶层,而是加大了两极分化。 二、财政政策和货币政策挤出的资金流有一部分没有进入实物投资领域 财政政策和货币政策的受益单位和人群之所以没有将资金投向
Recently, Yang Peng, an author of the Yunnan Provincial Government, analyzed that despite the vigorous fiscal policy and the corresponding readjustment of monetary policy, the purpose of starting domestic demand has not been met. The following are noteworthy: First, the fiscal and monetary policies The main beneficiaries are not low-income groups with different propensity to consume different income groups, the marginal propensity to consume low-income groups, low-income potential consumer demand larger, but without real incomes, potential consumer demand can not be transformed into reality Consumer demand. Since 1998, the total retail sales of social products have continued to drop in an ever-increasing proportion. This shows that the overall propensity to consume in the margins of the society has been reduced. At the same time, it shows that the real beneficiaries of the fiscal and monetary policies are not low-income ones but other reform measures are not supported. Polarization. Second, fiscal policy and monetary policy Excessive part of the flow of funds did not enter the field of real investment Financial policy and monetary policy benefited units and the crowd did not invest funds