论文部分内容阅读
大学生因贩卖国家二级重点野生保护动物被判处十年六个月有期徒刑,社会各界对此议论纷纷,多数认为量刑过重。对照判决书认定的事实和法律规定来看,这个判决结果已是判决书认定的事实前提下法定量刑幅度的最低限了。假如说司法机关是严格的按照真实的事实,适用正确的法律作出的判决,但是这个判决结果仍然达不到公正,那就是在立法层面与司法层面的衔接出了问题。为了更好的维护个案公正,立法与司法的协调成为重要的一个问题。
Students are sentenced to ten years and six months in prison for selling the national key wildlife of the second grade. Many people from all walks of life have talked about it in abundance. Judging from the facts and legal provisions of the verdict, the verdict of this verdict is the lowest limit of the legal sentencing range on the premise of the verdict. If we say that the judiciary strictly according to the real facts, the application of the correct law to make the verdict, but the verdict is still not up to justice, that is, the legislative level and the judicial level of the convergence of a problem. In order to better safeguard the impartiality of the case, the coordination of legislation and justice has become an important issue.