目前,司法学术界对许霆案的争论概括起来大致有:此罪与彼罪之争;有罪与无罪之争。为什么对许霆案会得出如此不同的判断结果。究竟原因,是犯罪手段的不断更新和变化与经济和社会的发展成正比例和我国刑事立法的滞后与犯罪手段不断更新和变化不同步性产生的。 At present, the judicial academia’s debate about Xu Ting can be summed up as follows: the dispute between sin and one sin; the dispute between guilt and innocence. Why Xu Ting case will come to such a different judgment. The reason is that the continuous updating and changing of criminal means are directly proportional to the economic and social development and the lag of criminal legislation in our country and the unsynchronized change of criminal means.