论文部分内容阅读
目的:观察与分析无痛分娩的临床疗效。方法:选取30例无痛分娩患者以及同期进行常规分娩的产妇30例,对其疼痛情况、产后出血量及产程等方面进行观察与相关数据统计,然后分析其结果。结果:无痛分娩产妇在第一产程和第二产程时间短于常规分娩产妇,而在第三产程时两组产妇无明显差异;产后出血量相比无明显差异(▲P>0.05)、新生儿Apgar评分也无显著差异(▲P>0.05),但无痛分娩产妇疼痛发生率明显低于常规分娩产妇(◆P<0.05)。结论:加强无痛分娩观察与分析对提高分娩质量至关重要。
Objective: To observe and analyze the clinical efficacy of painless childbirth. Methods: Thirty cases of painless childbirth and 30 cases of common childbirth during the same period were selected. The pain situation, postpartum hemorrhage and labor process were observed and related data were statistically analyzed, and the results were analyzed. Results: The painless childbirth time was shorter than that of routine childbirth in the first stage of labor and the second stage of labor, while there was no significant difference between the two groups in the third stage of labor. There was no significant difference in postpartum hemorrhage (P> 0.05) There was also no significant difference in Apgar score (P> 0.05), but the incidence of pain in painless childbirth was significantly lower than that of routine childbirth (P <0.05). Conclusions: Strengthening painless childbirth observation and analysis is essential to improve childbirth quality.