论文部分内容阅读
《最高人民法院关于刑事附带民事诉讼范围问题的规定》存在诸多有待商榷之处:将实体、程序问题合二为一的混杂解释不但无法保持法律的“纯洁”还造成了越权解释;财产执行中止、终结标准与民事诉讼法规定的不统一、对物质损失限制解释的无理性在给理论带来困惑的同时造成了司法实践的不公,无法全面有效的保障被害人的合法权益。针对上述问题未来的立法或司法解释应对相应法条作出适当的删除或修改。
The Supreme People’s Court’s “Provisions on the Scope of Civil Suit Collateral to Criminal Proceedings,” there are many issues to be discussed: the mixed interpretation of the substantive and procedural issues not only can not maintain the legal “purity ” also created ultra vires interpretation; property The implementation of the suspension, the termination criteria and the provisions of the Civil Procedure Law is not uniform, the irrational interpretation of the restrictions on material losses in the theory of confusion caused by the injustice of judicial practice, not fully and effectively protect the legitimate rights and interests of victims. The legislative or judicial interpretation of the above issues in the future should be appropriately deleted or amended accordingly.