在美国最近运用侵略性单边主义把单方面定义的不公平贸易强加给别国的实践中,不公平贸易问题还对固定规则的关贸总协定体系构成了另一个危险。 当然,这里我所指的是,美国贸易立法,如最近的1988年法案,运用301条例和超级301条款,要求同特定国家就美国发现的不可接受的“优先权”行为进行谈判,并在必要情况下实施关税报复,以促使其在美国规定的严格时限内放弃这些行为。这种政策的问题何在呢? In the recent U.S. practice of using unilateral unilateralism to impose unfair trade unilaterally imposed on other countries, unfair trade issues pose another danger to the GATT system of fixed rules. Of course, what I am referring to here is that U.S. trade legislation, such as the recent 1988 Act, uses the 301 and the Super 301 clauses to negotiate with certain countries about unacceptable “priority” actions discovered by the United States and, if necessary In the event of a tariff retaliation, to induce it to abandon those acts within the strict time limits set by the United States. What is the problem with this policy?