论文部分内容阅读
郑樵在《通志·校雠略·编次必谨类例论》一书中说:“学之不专者为书之不明也,书之不明者为类例之不分也…士卒之亡者由部伍之法不明也,书籍之亡者由类例之法不分也。类例分则百家九流各有条理,虽亡而不能亡也。”千百年来我国古籍分类的原则、方法不断发展,从六分、五分、七分到四分,先后产生了《七略》、《汉书·艺文志》、《隋书·经籍志》、《明史·艺文志》及私家的《郡斋读书志》、《遂初堂书目》、《直斋书录解题》等具有典型意义的古籍分类目录,更有集“四分法”之大成的《四库全书总目》。今天我们如何看待古籍分类?怎样在浩如烟海的古籍与
Zheng Qiao in the book “Notes Tongxue slightly edited version of the classics,” a book, said: “The experts do not know the book for the book is also unknown, The dead by the Ministry of law is unknown, the books of the dead by the type of law regardless of the type of sub-example is divided into nine categories of well-organized, although the death can not die also. ”For centuries ancient Chinese classification The principles and methods continue to evolve. From six points, five points, seven points to four points, “Qiliu”, “Han Yi Wen Zhi”, “Sui Shu Jing Ji Zhi”, “Ming Shi Yi Wen Zhi” and private “Book of Jishizhai”, “Suchuduan bibliography”, “Straight fast catalog solution” and other typical ancient books classified directory, but also set the “four points” of the culmination of “Sikuquanshu Head ”. How do we treat ancient books classification today?