论文部分内容阅读
德、日等国学者根据客观归责论,通常将危害结果作为结果犯中的因果关系要素。我国学者界定危害结果,要么限制其范畴,要么扩展其外延,忽视我国刑法中的危害结果的多样性与差异性。刑法中的危害结果,乃指刑法规定的,危害行为引起的、对定罪量刑具有意义和价值的损害或者危险状态。未完成形态中只有实害结果作为。罪过认定依据的结果具有终局性、广泛性与多样性等特征。危害行为与危害结果的相对同一性,是复合罪过的成立依据;两者的绝对同一性表明其心理态度可以完全一致。
Scholars in Germany, Japan and other countries, based on objective imputation, usually regard the endangering result as the causal element in the result. The scholars in our country define the endangering result, either limit their scope or extend their extension, ignoring the variety and difference of the endangering result in criminal law of our country. The endangerment result in the criminal law refers to the damage or the dangerous state which is of significance and value to the conviction and sentencing, which is caused by the criminal act and regulated by the criminal law. Unfinished form of the only real harm as a result. The results of the basis of sin have the characteristics of finality, extensiveness and diversity. The relative homogeneity between the harmful act and the endangering result is the foundation for the compound crime; the absolute identity between the two shows that their psychological attitude can be completely consistent.