论文部分内容阅读
目的探究并对比联苯苄唑乳膏与萘替芬酮康唑乳膏对体股癣的临床治疗效果。方法体股癣患者150例,根据治疗方式随机分为治疗组和对照组,其中74例患者被纳入对照组采用联苯苄唑乳膏治疗,76例患者纳入治疗组采用萘替芬酮康唑乳膏进行治疗,对比分析两组患者治疗前后症状以及体征评分的变化情况以及治疗的效果。结果治疗组治疗后症状以及体征评分(1.25±1.01)分明显优于对照组的(3.58±2.32)分,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);治疗组的总有效率为88.16%明显高于对照组的59.46%,两组比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论萘替芬酮康唑乳膏治疗体股癣患者所取得的治疗效果明显优于联苯苄唑乳膏,治疗有效率较高,可以在临床上推广运用。
Objective To explore and compare the clinical efficacy of bifonazole cream and naftifine conazole cream on the treatment of tinea corporis. Methods Totally 150 patients with tinea corporis were randomly divided into treatment group and control group according to the treatment method. Among them, 74 patients were enrolled in the control group with bifonazole cream, and 76 patients were enrolled in the treatment group with naftifine ketoconazole Cream for treatment, comparative analysis of two groups of patients before and after treatment of symptoms and signs of change and the effect of treatment. Results The symptom and symptom score (1.25 ± 1.01) in the treatment group were significantly better than those in the control group (3.58 ± 2.32), the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05); the total effective rate was 88.16% in the treatment group 59.46% of the control group, the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion The effect of naftifine and ketoconazole cream on treating tinea corporis is obviously superior to that of bifonazole cream. The treatment is effective and can be widely used clinically.