论文部分内容阅读
首先,作者回顾了阿尔布雷希特教授的报告,指出其所解读的贝克的风险社会理论还不够深入。其次,作者在阐明自己坚持的相对主义刑罚观的基础上,认定唯有设定正当目的的刑法才具有正当性;在借助贝克的风险社会理论进行分析后,承认无论是从社会还是从刑法和刑事政策本身来说,都难以阻挡刑法机能主义化的趋势。但是,作者认为应该反对刑法机能化,理由之一是传统刑法坚持了法治国这个宪法原则,理由之二是机能化的所谓现代刑法并不能解决当代的重大问题,相反却延误了我们通过其他方式解决问题的时机。
First, the author reviews Professor Albrecht’s report, pointing out that Beck’s theory of risk society is not sufficiently deep. Secondly, on the basis of expounding the concept of the relativistic penalty that he upheld, the author finds that only criminal law that sets proper purpose is justified. After analyzing the theory of risk society by Baker, the author admits that whether from the society or from the criminal law and Criminal policy itself, it is difficult to stop the trend of functional law of criminal law. However, the author believes that one should oppose the functionalization of criminal law. One of the reasons is that traditional criminal law upholds the constitutional principle of rule of law. The second reason is that functionalized so-called modern criminal law can not solve major issues of the present age. On the contrary, it delays us through other ways Time to solve the problem.