对话有合作型的,也有非合作型的。法庭审判遇到的非合作型对话,主要表现为两种:一种是在诉辩交易中使用威胁的策略,称为威胁型对话博弈;另一种是在对某些类型的证人(例如伪证证人、对方证人)进行询问时,这些证人使用故意拖延的策略,可称为拖延型对话博弈。两种对话表现不同,但都以非合作的方式进行,值得从对话逻辑的角度进行深入分析。 Dialogue has cooperation type, but also non-cooperation type. There are two main types of non-cooperative dialogue encountered in court trials: one is the use of threats in the plea bargaining process, the so-called threat-based dialogue game, and the other is the challenge of certain types of witnesses (such as perjury Witnesses, opposing witnesses), these witnesses use deliberately delayed strategies, which may be called protracted conversational games. The two dialogues perform differently, but both are conducted in a non-cooperative manner and deserve further analysis from the perspective of dialogical logic.