论文部分内容阅读
在确定精神损害赔偿数额时,“侵权人获利”应作为独立因素被考量。但是,“侵权人获利”因素有其特定适用范围,即只适用于对他人精神性人格权强制商业化的情形。在确定精神损害赔偿数额时,“侵权人获利”因素之引入预示着对精神性人格权中所包含的财产利益的承认,某些侵害精神性人格权行为的责任形式亦应由精神损害向财产损害过渡。如此,对“侵权人获利”行为矫正的请求权基础除了侵权法外,还将包括不当得利和不法(无因)管理。
In determining the amount of compensation for moral damages, “profit infringer” should be considered as an independent factor. However, the “profit-infringer” factor has its specific scope of application, that is, it applies only to the forced commercialization of the spiritual rights of others. In determining the amount of compensation for moral damages, the introduction of the “profit-infringer” element indicates the recognition of the property interests contained in the spiritual personality right, and certain forms of liability that infringe upon the spiritual personality rights also fall within the spirit of Damage to property damage transition. Thus, in addition to the law of tort, the basis of the right to remedy the “infringer’s profit” behavior will also include unjust enrichment and unscrupulous (without cause) management.