论文部分内容阅读
目的研究和探讨中西医结合治疗及护理干预在非酒精性脂肪肝临床疗效观察分析。方法选择2015年2月~2017年7月期间在我院就诊治疗的“非酒精性脂肪肝”患者,将之随机抽取的74例,按照数字表达法分为37例的对照组(常规对症治疗护理组)和37例的观察组(中西医结合治疗及护理干预组)。对两组患者治疗后的总有效率以及护理满意度进行比较分析。结果观察组患者24例显效(64.86%)、11例有效(29.72%)、2例无效(5.40%),总有效35例(94.59%),对照组患者16例显效(43.24%)、10例有效(27.02%)、11例无效(29.72%),总有效26例(70.27%),前者明显优于后者,组间比有差异(P<0.05);在护理方面,对照组患者有9例(24.32%)感觉不满意,2例(5.40%)较差,满意度为70.27%,观察组仅有2例(5.40%)患者感觉不满意,满意度为94.59%,组间比有差异(P<0.05)。结论以改善非酒精性脂肪肝患者治疗效果为目的,提高其护理质量,对其采用中西医结合的方式对其进行治疗,同时辅以护理干预,能有效提高其治疗效果,且得到了患者及其家属的一致认可,值得临床上推广并应用。
Objective To study and explore the clinical efficacy of integrated traditional Chinese and Western medicine treatment and nursing intervention in non-alcoholic fatty liver. Methods A total of 74 patients randomly selected from February 2015 to July 2017 in our hospital for treatment of non-alcoholic fatty liver were divided into control group (n = 37) according to the number expression method Symptomatic treatment care group) and 37 cases of observation group (Integrative Medicine treatment and nursing intervention group). The two groups of patients after treatment, the total efficiency and nursing satisfaction were compared. Results In the observation group, 24 cases were markedly effective (64.86%), 11 cases were effective (29.72%), 2 cases were ineffective (5.40%), 35 cases were effective (94.59% (27.02%), 11 cases were ineffective (29.72%) and 26 cases were effective (70.27%). The former was significantly better than the latter (P <0.05). In the aspect of nursing, there were 9 (24.32%) did not feel satisfied, 2 cases (5.40%) were poor, the satisfaction was 70.27%, only 2 patients (5.40%) in the observation group were not satisfied, the satisfaction was 94.59% (P <0.05). Conclusion To improve the treatment effect of patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver, improve the quality of nursing care, and treat it with the combination of Chinese and Western medicine, at the same time with nursing intervention, which can effectively improve the treatment effect, and get the patients and The unanimous approval of their families, it is worth clinical promotion and application.