论文部分内容阅读
对于妇女与政治的关系,传统的由男性主导的政治社会学认为:妇女的政治参与状况不如男性;妇女对于政治活动的兴趣和政治意识较男性缺乏,其所关注的问题,是道德或家庭义务的反映,较缺少“政治性”;妇女的政治活动稳定性也不如男性。对此,女性主义社会学家帕米拉·阿伯特(Pamela Abbott)和克莱尔·华莱士(Claire Wallace)进行了重新审视。她们指出,事实上,妇女在政治上并不缺乏兴趣和活跃。但是,却往往疏远于政治,并被由男人支配和控制的各种组织排除在外。这是因为,妇女在政治上的活动与关切是被边缘化的和“被历史掩盖的”。因而,必须对政治进行重新界定。
For the relationship between women and politics, the traditional male-dominated sociology of politics considers that women’s political participation is not as good as that of men; women’s interest and political awareness of political activities is less than that of men; and their concerns are moral or family obligations The lack of “political ” women’s political stability is not as good as men. In response, the feminist sociologists Pamela Abbott and Claire Wallace reevaluated. They point out that, in fact, women are not politically interested and active. However, they are often excluded from politics and excluded from the various organizations governed and controlled by men. This is because women’s political activities and concerns are marginalized and “hidden by history ”. Therefore, politics must be redefined.