论文部分内容阅读
在宪治国家中,宪法统领国家政治生活并约束着一切国家权力。警察权作为事关国家安全、社会稳定和人权保障的重要权力亦不例外,其产生运行必须获得宪法或法律授权。从宪法文本角度观察,尽管世界各国对警察权的规范方式不尽相同并各具特色,但对警察权之目的与功能界定则高度相似。这在一定程度上为我国警察权之宪法规制提供了经验和借鉴。我国宪法文本亦不乏警察权规范,“人权保障”、“分工制约”等宪法原则应成为当前警察法修改之基本理念,并在警察权功能与范围界定、警察法体系构建等问题上,与宪法精神与规范保持一致。
In the constitutional state, the constitution ruled the country’s political life and bound all state power. As an important power concerning national security, social stability and human rights protection, police power must be authorized by the Constitution or by law. From the perspective of the constitutional text, although the norms of the police power in different countries are different and different, the purpose and function of the police power are very similar. To a certain extent, this provides the experience and reference for the constitutional regulation of police power in China. The constitutional norms in our country also lack the norms of police power. The constitutional principles such as “human rights protection” and “division of labor” should become the basic idea of the current revision of the police law. In addition, the constitutional functions of the police power and the definition of the scope of the police law system On the same constitutional spirit and norms.