论文部分内容阅读
山西稷山“诽谤”案3名被告的行为应定性为举报而非“诽谤”,不构成犯罪。即使受害人认定3名干部的行为构成诽谤罪,也只能自己亲自起诉,不能由公安机关侦查、检察院公诉。将自诉案办成公诉案件,县委书记涉嫌滥用职权,公、检、法三家涉嫌违法办案。利用职权法办举报自己的党员干部违反党纪,该“诽谤”案传递出地方“一把手”专制集权的多项警讯。防止地方“一把手”专制集权破坏法治应推进几点改革。
The three defendants in the Jishan case of “defamation” in Shanxi Province should be classified as a report rather than a “libel” and should not constitute a crime. Even if the victim determines that the conduct of the three cadres constitutes defamation, he can only sue himself personally and can not be prosecuted by the public security organ or procuratorate. The prosecution case into a public prosecution case, the county party secretary alleged abuse of power, public security, the three suspected illegal handling. Using the power of office to report that party members and cadres violated party discipline, the “defamation case” passed many warnings about the authoritarian centralization of “top leaders” in the place. Prevent local “number one” authoritarian centralization ruin the rule of law should promote several reforms.