论文部分内容阅读
为了使HFACS这种事故分析方法能够在我国各种类型事故中得到应用,研究了HFACS的不安全监管因素中各指标的定义和分类,并将其与事故致因24 Model中的不安全动作因素进行对比,得出两者的对应关系和各自特点。结果表明:HFACS中多数不安全监管因素属于24 Model中的不安全动作,这些不安全动作的发出者都是监管者;24 Model中不安全动作的发出者既可以是事故的直接引发者,也可以是监管者。从监管的范畴来看,HFACS中不安全监管因素的范围小于24 Model中的监管范围,只包括组织内部的监管。
In order to make HFACS such accident analysis method can be applied in all kinds of accidents in China, the definition and classification of each index in HFACS’s unsafe regulatory factors are studied and compared with the unsafe action factors Compared to come to the correspondence between the two and their own characteristics. The results show that most of the unsafe regulatory factors in HFACS belong to unsafe actions in 24 Model, and those unscrupulous actions are issued by supervisors. The issuers of unsafe actions in Model 24 can be both direct initiators of accidents and Can be regulators. From a regulatory perspective, the extent of unsustainable regulatory factors in HFACS is less than the regulatory scope in the Model 24, including only those within the organization.