论文部分内容阅读
在刑事诉讼诉讼过程中,侦查人员作为某些案件证据最初的接触者以及取证活动所形成的程序法事实的证据来源主体,由其充当证人参与法庭质证活动具有重要意义,不仅有利于案件真实的发现和实体法律的正确适用,而且有利于激发刑事诉讼各方参与者的主动性,彰显程序自身的公正性,还可有力约束侦查人员的非法取证行为。①因此,侦查人员作证制度具有重要的理论和实践价值,文章拟在相关法律规定的基础上,从作证范围和作证方式两方面对我国侦查人员作证制度进行探究。希望通过对以上两者的探究,提出完善侦查人员作证制度的建议,以促进该制度在司法实践中的具体落实,真正发挥该制度应有的诉讼价值。
In the process of criminal procedure litigation, investigators as the first contacts of evidence in some cases and the main source of evidence of the procedural law facts formed by forensic activities are of great significance as witnesses to participate in the forensic activities of the court, which is not only beneficial to the authenticity of the case Discovering the correct application of substantive law, but also conducive to arousing the initiative of all parties involved in the criminal proceedings, highlighting the fairness of the procedure itself, and effectively restraining the investigators’ illegal forensics. (1) Therefore, investigators’ testimony system has important theoretical and practical value. Based on the relevant laws and regulations, the article probes into the testimony system of investigators in our country from the scope of testimony and the mode of testifying. Hope that through the exploration of the above two, put forward suggestions to improve the investigators’ testimony system so as to promote the concrete implementation of the system in judicial practice and truly exert the due litigation value of the system.