论文部分内容阅读
英国的普通法传统不承认非法证据排除规则,证据的可信性决定着证据的可采性;但这种传统的制度立场在当代逐渐发生现代转型,即取证方式的合法性成为判定证据能力的重要因素。英国当前的非法证据排除规则在制度构型上表现出以下特点:以司法公平为理论基础;以基本法和一般法律为规范法源;以利益权衡为运作模式。我国当前的非法证据排除规则的制度改革,可以从英国证据规则的衍生史与制度构型中得到启示:实现证据规则理念由证据可信性到证据可采性的现代转型;并实现证据规则构架由简单化规则到系统化规则的现代转型。
The common law tradition in the United Kingdom does not recognize the rule of exclusion of illegal evidence, and the credibility of evidence determines the admissibility of evidence. However, the traditional institutional standpoint has undergone a modern transformation gradually in the contemporary era, that is, the legitimacy of the evidence collection mode becomes the evidence-based Key factor. The current rule of exclusion of illegal evidence in the United Kingdom shows the following characteristics in terms of institutional configuration: taking judicial justice as the theoretical basis; using the basic law and general law as the source of law; and using the balance of interests as the mode of operation. The current system reform of illegal evidence exclusion rules in our country can be enlightened from the derivation history and institutional configuration of the British evidence rules: to realize the modern transformation of the rules of evidence rules from the evidence credibility to the admissibility of evidence; and to implement the rules of evidence rules From Simple Rules to Systematic Rules of Modern Transformation.