自古以来,我们就一直推崇孔子在《子路、曾皙、冉有、公西华侍坐》(以下简称《侍坐》)中表现出的教学方式,誉之为“循循善诱的典型、因材施教的范例”。在这里,笔者斗胆发表自己的不同意见:《侍坐》中的教师这一形象(即孔子)所表现出来的主观意识太过浓厚,其集中体现在对子路和对曾皙两人截然不同的态度上。纵观孔子一生,积极“入世”一直是其思想的主导方面,但他“礼治”的政治主张,经实践证明, Since ancient times, we have been praising Confucius for his teaching methods demonstrated in “Zilu, Zeng Xi, Ran You and Gong Xihua Sit” (hereinafter referred to as “Sit-seated”), praised as “ example”. Here, I dare to express my own different opinions: the subjective consciousness shown in the image of the teacher in the “Sit-seated” (ie, Confucius) is too strong, and it is embodied in a totally different attitude toward Zilu and Zeng Xi Attitude. Throughout his life, his active “WTO accession” has always been the dominant aspect of his thinking. However, his political proposition of “courtesy” has been proven by practice.